How to binary trade xml in javascript

Binary options trading may incur losses as well as gains. Fixed the binary bot url in 404. Think you found a bug? Visual automation for binary. Visit wiki for more info. They should not be construed as giving investment advice, and you should not rely on them as your singular factor in making or refraining from making any investment decisions. Disclaimer: All the files and codes in the above links are intended for educational and informational purposes only. If all you want to do is send an XML file to a known URL via AJAX its fairly simple in javascript with no lovelies like jQuery etc. The below code is a bit messy and fairly basic, but hopefully it should point you in the right direction. XML file and have it stored as string variable somewhere.

And probably jQuery if I needed it. XML into a multipart MIME format message. YUI3 available to me. Html is returned encoded, so decode. XML file that is being transmitted. Why not just posting XML as XML, as in a normal HTTP POST? JavaScript, otherwise any page could send any file from your computer over the internet without user intervention. Edit: The external url is an advertising bot, the xml essentially describes what sort of ad I want to get back.

There are probably better ways of fetching an AJAX object if you search for them, but this is a method I have used for ages and never really have any problems with. Everything in the computer is represented in binary. After your edit it becomes clearer. Either from big endian to little endian, or from CRLF line endings to LF or CR line endings. For example when the RSI at www. First of all, thank you for all your hard work with this project. Stop loss of money of trades, but it will take some time. Is it a way to contact you?

MA 20 if the candle penetrated MA will conduct an open position can host gives examples for indicators I mean? The rsi in web. Hi Aminmarashi, how much do you charge for Editing this Binary. BOT so it only begins martingale after a certain amount of consecutive losses. EMA Indis to make it choose direction. Indonesia, can I ask for help? Thank you for this big collection. Which leads to majjor loss of money when it takes some few sec to buy next trade and it cant really follow exact 5 min candle. Help please kinda new at this trying to figure out how this really works.

And thanks for that 10 sec pause it really is important in this method. Any idea about this? The script analyzes the ticks and after 5 consecutive ticks in the same direction, up or down the bot bets the opposite direction. How use this bot with Martingale? Any idea how to make it synchronized? Just gotta pause and start to follow candles start 5min for the best result. Get previous tick candle or RSI. Would you help me? Can you help me build a bot for the pattern. Any ideas if it can be done, and how.

If they are 5 ticks raising the bet is that the stock will fall in price. Alternate Hi Lo with Martingale, with pause trading after three losses. It went on autopilot just to test the results of the EMAs. Binary Bot version is more consistent with the MT5 platform values, though the difference should not be significant. Hello amin thanks for sharing this bot with us. Maybe you had this issue before? Got it to work ONCE but then after 3 advanced bots running at the same time my computer froze. To big loss of money amount after the 2 last trades. The sad part is that I forgot to save the work.

In this script I would like to use the Martingale, but without being bet immediately following, but obeying the rule above in all bets. If the data happens to be text, you can dump it into a CDATA section and be done with it, but true binary data needs to be encoded in a safe and recoverable manner. Web browsers, can deal directly with XML data. An embedded image file. Split up the section end. Find out how to process XML directly in the browser with jQuery. Clearly the CDATA section is useful, but like all good things, it has a couple of limitations for you to keep in mind. IBM product evaluation versions: Get your hands on application development tools and middleware products.

Listing 1 shows a simple paragraph sample with some emphasized text. CDATA in HTML or XHTML reliably, if at all. What can you do if you need to put a section end marker into a CDATA section? CDATA section and you might end up getting a parser error when it hits the real section end. CDATA section and still have a valid document. In either case, the contents of the CDATA section will be available without modification. If you serve the XML files through a Web service, make sure that your client applications can deal with potentially large data transfers without timing out or blocking their user interface as the data trickles in over a 3G connection.

Learn about several sets of names which are assigned to Unicode characters. Read more about encoding data in XML files. This is invalid XML. Web pages that have embedded JavaScript. CDATA section comes into play. The XML FAQ: Explore another excellent source of XML information, the XML FAQ edited by Peter Flynn.

PCDATA and used to parse element names and entities. The best way to deal with binary data in XML is to avoid it entirely. You absolutely cannot nest CDATA sections. HTML, referring to an external file in a standardized way works well. Check out this source for specific details about XML features such as the CDATA section. CSS parser in the client Web browser. Do it this way. CDATA section, but others will provide it as something more generic, generally an XML text node. No, this is wrong.

CDATA section, and ends with a comment that closes off the CDATA section. Using XMLHttpRequest: Read an excellent article about dealing with the results of Ajax calls. CDATA sections are included in XHTML documents, they do have to handle them properly in XML documents loaded through Ajax. Paragraphs can include emphasized text. XML technical library: See the developerWorks XML Zone for a wide range of technical articles and tips, tutorials, standards, and IBM Redbooks. Anything between those bits of markup will pass through the XML parser untouched. The Trading Bot Wins On Binary. For just about everything else, I use JSON. You can fetch the Model data with XHR or via SCRIPT tags.

What I wonder is: What is the best way for handling separation of concerns when using AJAX? When practical, XML is the golden standard. This might come in handy for single pages, but thinking from a web applications and web services point of view, its usability is zero. Will you switch to another output format in the future? HTML delivery method they may well get some information. For example your server script makes a SQL query but the table does not exists, the server script does not have the fatal error but the database returns one. DOM, leaves only one good option remaining? JSON because it is just the raw data you need, but includes structure as well. And generating that data in a format native to the server side language is great.

As long as the server and client agree, the actual format of transmission can be anything. The results from comparing XML DOM vs JSON performance should be up shortly. JS object models and functionality. So communication with the server, then, should be abstract, clean, and codified: all the things that XML stands for. Tagneto has tags to do that. Web browser is the client and loads an interactive gui that talks to the server. You handle this in your script and return the error to JavaScript, keeping the error flag on. Hey Alex, I certainly agree in your case JSON is the way to go! Paul Koch, mobile platform strategist, consultant, and trainer.

XML DOM for presentation only. Take the return String from the function and use innerHTML or DOMParser to inject into DOM. Even E4X should be enough to convince everyone! This is simply not true! HTML snippets, or generated on the fly from my JS objects. JSON is cool, but it requires custom written data processing geared solely for AJAX. Also, JSON may not always be the best answer either. Those have worked alright, though they always seemed awkward to me. XML has too many angle brackets for my taste. This way I can have a single fragment providing content for both synchronous and asynchronous use cases.

Both formats, and both kinds of scripts, have their advantages and disadvantages. That way the data is there on page load, and when I need to update it, I just call the same server side script as before using XMLHttpRequest. Nonetheless I feel that XML remains the best overall format for the time being, mainly because people are used to it. That way I can return more sophisticated return codes without having to tinker with the HTML to be inserted. We could cleverly write the server side script to build a complete, accessible HTML page that can be shown to any device. Can you think of other advantages or disadvantages of the three formats? The script looks rather a lot like the XML script. At the top of your server script, set an error flag to on, when your server script is done and is about to encode to JSON, set the error flag to good.

Which output format did you use in a practical, commercial AJAX application? Maybe this is a really terrible method for some reason unknown to me, but I like to return response text as a string of javascript commands. The layout is created entirely on the server and can be appropriately modularized. Using XML or JSON, I would still need to be able to generate the same HTML snippet. This setup is doubly important in my case because the app acts as a 3rd party data supplier. XSLT and JSON performance in IE and FF. Other than that, it also allows the same sources to be used in other circumstances, which might also be a bonus. Sure, if you only need to display it right away, JSON is no better than XML. RSS and ATOM feeds server side with XSL. With HTML snippets, this problem does not exist.

APIs is a great example of this. JSON formating is good for initializing a model or passing messages to a javascript controller. If you want it to be not difficult read, then use XML, but if not, use something else. If they are really pure data being pulled from the server, XML is the best choice because everyone is using it. But given the choice, my preference is becoming JSON more and more! Now personally I find this much clearer, the information to boilerplate ratio is much higher. JSON is not the default output format for the Yahoo!

AJAX for several systems, and in each case I needed to process the returned data rather than dump it straight into a div. In turn, the transformation returns HTML. We are about to go down a slippery slope of javascript secutiy issues. The third method is JSON, JavaScript Object Notation. AJAX web apps in which modules are retrieved as needed. Main disadvantage is the verbosity of the XML used, I suppose. JSON can even be better sometimes. However, if you use XML in your messages, it means your server script has to understand it and load an XML parser. Ajax templates and your Ajax snippets.

It is important to differentiate what you are getting via AJAX. JS, it is best to have the model data in JS form. Not as human readable as XMl, but a lot easier to parse. Another point is you are supposed to be in control of the server. That way, I can pass a JS model structure to the function to combine the HTML View with the model data. One advantage HTML snippets have over the two other formats is that they allow to keep layout code in a single place. An other alternative is to generate a HTML spippet out of the XML using XSLT. This is obviously a matter of opinion, since there are many ways to skin a cat, and not all of them are hacks.

JSON is the greatest thing since sliced bread for AJAXy purposed. When needed to load large amounts of data, you will not create a big overhead this way by having to define object names and so on. Additionally, using the javascript eval method enables you to see ALL the output of the requested script for debugging purposes. Being part of a big company, our particular group is big on RAD, and json really facilitates this. The server side becomes overly complicated and enabling access to your data and services to other clients becomes difficult. In addition, HTML snippets may become quite complicated. Which format do you think is best, or at least most useful in a practical AJAX environment? Consider this case: the app delivers an initial version of a page to the browser. If so, which one and why? The benefit of using the XML document is how many other applications you can use it natively.

JS class that will take an XML source, and feed it into an HTML page through data bindings defined in the HTML. XML as the output format. All those closing tags. JSON carefully and might switch to it for an unrestricted access application I have in mind. XML, Web Services etc. And under load, this will make a big difference for the server charge. Praesent et diam a ligula facilisis venenatis. The HTML is inserted into the DOM through JavaScript.

Every COM call into an XML document. Probably not a good idea due to lack of XSLT support in some browsers. JSON data are slightly simpler and slightly more in line with the rest of the JavaScript language than scripts for XML data. It seems like a good method for getting information. JSON from the server. Both our calls are on the level: save this record; lookup street and city for this postal code and house number.

XSLT on the client. That function is taken care of not difficult with JSON. If the request happens to be made by an AJAX script, the server side script would discard all HTML except for the search results, or the AJAX script itself would search for the results. JS, so a more experienced coder than I could probably streamline it further. Should you search an XML document for specific nodes and copy their text to the HTML? Even now, every time I load an XML parser I shudder at the CPU and memory numbers I see. This enables you to do a heck of a lot more than to just change HTML, as well as enables you to change things all over the place with a few simple lines of code. Jim Ley was good to point out the speed diference.

In my opinion, this is the most safe and scalable way to do it. XSLT as well and transformed it on the server with great results. And JSON fits these needs quite naturally. If the server is a public web service sending data to javascript applications, PERL scripts, and whatever else someone codes up to use the information, then XML has a great advantage. With the exception of the Internet Explorer problems, which seem to have reasonable workarounds, the HTML snippets seems to me the best starting point. Why not use it to receive data from the server. If one is found, the JSON object is loaded with a document. JSON is light, less bandwidth, XML is bloated. With HTML snippets, the appropriate new markup is generated on the server by the same code that generated the initial markup.

XML makes the most sense to me and is my preferred method for transferring data from a server. Whereas using HTML snippets is directly related to how it will be used on the page. Especially if there is a lot of data to process. HTML string and plug it in. On still other occasions. JSON, rather than trying to roll my own JSON by hand. Greek hero enters modern JavaScript development. XML, JSON have poor error recovery, HTML wins here, XML is slow, HTML is bandwidth heavy. For larger items, I almost always go with XSLT. JSON much, but it looks interesting.

RPC look quite similar to using HTML snippets. XSL; I think it goes against the idea of thin clients too much. JavaScript object, which you then read out. XSLT would come in handily, since this language is meant precisely to convert an XML document to another kind of XML, and since XHTML is XML, we can also use it to create Web page snippets. MSXML is being used. XML document time and again.

If you access the data as a stream then a YAML format is easier. HTML would have just been extremely problematic. This eliminates the delay in the initial page load since functionality is only retrieved as needed. Asking which of the 3 main formats is better is like asking whether a tank or sports car is better; it depends on what the problem is. Even for HTML snippets, I make the text of the snippet part of the object sent, and insert it. XML is needlessly chatty. Despite a backend error your JSON object is still in tact and able to alert the proper database error without JavaScript dying. So the flexibility there seems nice. AJAX primarily to update events and maintain the structure and relationship of objects from the client to the server. There are other potential output formats.

Javascript from the response, and with properties identical to the object class structure on the server. RPC because it is a standardized protocol. It contains orders and parameters which may be pure HTML or other parameters depending on the order. Note that I call it a snippet, since we do not receive a complete HTML page. XML and HTML for AJAX responses. JSON, but would prefer XML, as it makes simply more sense when you speak about web services that are used by perhaps more than your simple application in the future. HTML and so an HTML snippet looks like the best option. Once you have the communications being wrapped in json on each end, you should rarely be looking at raw json.

The performance at the client is almost pointless. Is it possible to use HTML snippits without using the innerHTML property? JSON, and any scripts in script tags. XML, never mixed within the same project. Does anyone have a simple solution to this? XSLT can have a very concise implementation in JavaScript and it can be quite fast. And, dave, the problem is not only about getting the data. What if you have a search method that returns results in the JSON form, then somebody comes along and tells you they are publishing their API and the search method should be publicly available. It helps to modularize things, too, because then if you want to change up the interface you only have to rewrite the JavaScript, and you never even worry about your backend AJAX handlers.

Orders are separated by a special character. Its a really big debate since we want to maintain a standard, either one or the other, no more mixed techniques between the different developers that use ajax. To answer question no. To search fragment for an element or an attribute. XML is a bit too much of a holy cow, I think. XSLT for another time. XML has been around for quite a while and that many developers are already accustomed to it. CSV parser in JavaScript and it works pretty well. AJAX and parse it into my own object model, and create a custom interpreter script for each object hierarchy.

CSV, a simple proprietary text API, Base64 encoded binary stream of GZIPed data. If just Model data, then JSON is best, since you probably want to keep the data around for multiple requests and user actions. The trick there is to allow the developer to make HTML snippets that get converted to proper JS functions. XML would be the best solution, but in thinking about this a little more, HTML snippets could well be considered XML, right? PPK, is the HTML method at all useful for instances where you want data from the server that will change how multiple parts of the current page will be displayed? We ask for the JavaScript books they have in store, and by a staggering coincidence they have exactly those three JavaScript books I keep lying around on my desk. The JavaScript required to insert the data into the HTML page is quite verbose. In that situation deliver HTML under the KISS principle. XML, which was very straightforward on the server, and moderately so on the client.

When returning from XMLHTTP, I use Javascript to analyze and separate orders and then execute them each after the other, using the provided parameters. RPC transport protocol, then, is mostly transparent to the application in which it is utilized. XML is great for data retrieval, but you can do other, more convenient things using innerHTML. HTML, a JavaScript solution might be more responsive due to smaller downloads. HTML is great as a simple way to get computed information from the server to a client browser which may be javascript capable. The reason I like HTML is that I can put the part I need to update. Different formats have different advantages and people should try to look into things before blowing them off. AJAX request, what sort of response should the server give? PPK: I understand your point about JSON data being slightly less readable by humans compared with xml.

However, if you import a JSON file as a script tag you circumvent this problem, and any JSON data can be imported into any website. Of course, the choice probably depends most on the context of your solution. The other reason I use HTML is speed. The debugging should be the layer above it at the objects that come in and out of translation. HTML snippets violated seperation concerns. In my last project I received some data as XML documents and some as HTML snippets, and they needed different kinds of scripts to write the data to the page. For example, you call an undefined function or you have a parse error on line 101, the script dies then and there without being able to encode your data object into JSON and echo it. How can you say optimizing on the client side is pointless, and then go on to point out that your choice for server side implementation is essentialy an exercise in optimization? Changing the HTML snippet the AJAX request returns should be no different than changing any other template on your site. JSON and such are made for solving that problem.

The only thing against it is that it _can_ be hard to understand. In my opinion, traditional pages where the browser is only used as a viewer in the MVC paradigm are best served with this format. Client computers differ in speed, available resources. XML just in case someone else wants to use it. Does the garbage collection work as well as one would hope? Editing json by hand for storage is ideal in some circumstances as light data sources, but even this should really be done by scripts encoding objects and caching the output. Well, at least it knocks out HTML snippets and JSON; several alternatives to XML that do not use these functions have already been discussed. In addition, this format offers interesting accessibility options. My experience is that the need for random access to data nodes is much less common than most people think. JavaScript then tries to decode the responseText but fails, then catches and alerts the responseText giving the actual server language error.

Plus, as stated, XML is common, everyone knows it. Mainly XML documents, a few HTML snippets. The performance is simply incredible, and it returns a very large data set. In general, using XML and JSON allows you to retrieve various data irregardless of how it will be used on the page. The most important disadvantage of JSON is that the format is very hard to read for humans, and that, of course, every single comma, quote, and bracket should be in exactly the correct place. This article has been translated into Spanish. JSON string which is converted to a JavaScript object? If the HTML snippet contains forms, or if the receiving HTML element is a form, this method give horrific errors in Explorer. Is there a way they can render XML themselves?

Using JSON can be more elegant than using XML in some instances. If you keep the data seperate from the use on the page, it will allow you to use the same request in a variety of ways and will also improve your benefit from being able to cache requests. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. JSON is an just as arbitrarily abstract as XML. JSON is the most appropriate method. Also, do you have use eval? Here, too, XSLT might come in handy. And since that only works with XML, I may switch to XML. Speed matters on both the client AND server.

As of now I have used HTML snippets the most, followed by the other method, XML. Anyway, I think it depends what are the data and where they come from. The first and most obvious choice for an output format is the XML document. Sometimes you need to manipulate the data with javascript and the DOM will slow down the process while an array or another programmatic based structure would have been more efficient. CSS to use or what HTML to generate? The second, and maybe the most interesting, output format is an HTML snippet. As PPK stated, it is very not difficult to write code that will gracefully fail on older browsers using this method. IE7 when xmlhttp no longer requires ActiveX for example.

The XML is then transformed on the server, to avoid XSLT processor differences in different web browsers and to get a more widespread support. Rarely are you going to manually type objects to be returned, it is almost always going to be server generated data that you are returning. Thus the server side script that generates the HTML may become quite complicated. That will change your order of magnitude to look the other way around I think since it is quite slow. To insert fragment into innerHTML object asynchronously. You may want to use SOAP just because you can implement a call to it from about any language in a couple mouse clicks. XSLT out of the discussion, since it is way superior than JavaScript when it comes to handling and selecting data. Has anyone encountered memory leaks with the constant creation of new anonymous objects? It does the same things, it just reads out the data from another format.

JSON is just incredibly not difficult to use on the Javascript side of things, especially when populating or updating state objects rather than going straight to generating HTML with the data received. DOM structure, when the actual AJAX call only took 1 second. RPC, both physically and conceptually. XML, pulling out the data, and building an HTML DOM structure can get very time consuming. RPC to power two very successful database manipulation projects. As a developer, I need to trade off which is faster not only on the client, but also for development time. These are the three output formats you can use for getting AJAX data. XSLT is very fast. XML parsing and straight XHTML replacement simultaneously.

Can you think of another output format? Below is what it looks like using some helpers classes. If I ever have the need, I can not difficult read XHTML as XML, so I think the distinction there is irrelevant. JSON string that is returned from your XMLHTTPRequest. Telamon accompanied Jason as an Argonaut. JS unserialize to convert it into a javascript object. One thing is that people could also create a function to convert XML into a javascript object, though that would of course cause the script to take even longer and be a waste when you could just as not difficult use JSON. XML because the application needed to handle data rather than formatted content.

Later on, elements on this page are replaced or new, similar items are added through Ajax requests. In practice, it takes a lot of code to do pretty simple things with XML, as you said. With the two other formats, only data is delivered to the browser and there scripts have to massage XML or JavaScript objects into appropriate DOM structures. Rather a lot of code, as you see. HTML is probably nice for quick tests or small applications or prototypes. HTML of a span or div. JSON is great if a full javascript application is running on the client.

However, another advantage to the XML format is that it could not difficult be used for traditional web services as well. CSS for writing reusable snippets. XML or JSON, but the HTML snippet format is the easiest one for this job. JMS selectors since it is frequently useful to receive only a subset of these messages. XML or plain text encoded as XML content. ActiveMQ supports Ajax which is an Asychronous Javascript And Xml mechanism for real time web applications.

Firstly we could not difficult add support for pushlets to ActiveMQ. To receive messages, the client must define a message handling function and register it with the amq object. IP, proxy or browser timeout closing the connection. Browser windows opened in the same millisecond in separate browsers will not interact, since they are in different sessions. ActiveMQ to binary messages, and will not be visible to your web clients. Unless the server can distinguish listeners from multiple windows, messages which were intended for 1 window will be delivered to another one instead.

When the MessageListenerServlet receives a listen message, it lazily creates a MessageAvailableConsumer and registers a Listener on it. The servlet both serves the required js files and handles the JMS requests and responses. HTTP encoding of messages, rather than using JavaScript function calls as the transfer protocol. If a destination channel or topic do not exist, it is created. Polling normally means periodically making a request to see if there are messages available and there is a trade off: either the poll frequency is high and excessive load is generated when the system is idle; or the frequency is low and the latency for detecting new messages is high. The Apache Software Foundation. All windows in a single browser need a unique clientId when they call amq. Including these scripts results in the creation of a javascript object called amq, which provides the API to send messages and to subscribe to channels and topics. By default, an ajax client will receive all messages on a topic or queue it is subscribed to. Instead the client must perform a special type of Poll for messages. When a client registers a listener, a message subscription request is sent from the client to the server in a POST in the same way as a message, but with a type of listen.

Each can have a separate set of message subscriptions on the broker with no interactions between them. If another servlet container is used, the Continuation mechanism falls back to use a wait and the thread is not released. GET request or as a POST if there are other messages ready to be delivered from the client to the server. Or using a zero timeout GET to poll queues. Ajax support in ActiveMQ builds on the same basis as the REST connector for ActiveMQ which allows any web capable device to send or receive messages over JMS. Note that this clientId need only be unique within a single session. Current jQuery, Prototype, and Dojo are supported, and recent versions of all three libraries are shipped with ActiveMQ. Other schemes to ensure the uniqueness of clientId can not difficult be devised.

The message is sent to the destination as a TextMessage. When used in this way, the Javascript client will receive only messages containing an identifier header set to the value TEST. As soon as the amq. This is effective as long as two browser windows are not opened within the same millisecond, and is the approach used by the example chat. Effectively, this means that amq. Once it has processed all the messages, it immediately sends another poll to the server. The waiting poll described above is implemented using the Jetty 6 Continuations mechanism. When a message is received, a call back to the myHandler. Apache ActiveMQ, ActiveMQ, Apache, the Apache feather logo, and the Apache ActiveMQ project logo are trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation.

Selectors are supplied to an amq. To avoid the load vs latency tradeoff, AMQ uses a waiting poll mechanism. So Pushlets tie the server to the web page; with Ajax we can have a generic service which works with any page. Note that this clientId is common to all message subscriptions in a single tab or window, and is entirely different from the clientId which is supplied as a first argument in amq. All windows or tabs in a single browser share the same JSESSIONID on the ActiveMQ server. The ajax featues of amq are provided on the client side by the amq. The ajax featues of amq are handled on the server side by the AjaxServlet which extends the MessageListenerServlet. These clientId values are internal to each web page, and do not need to be unique across multiple windows or tabs.

All other marks mentioned may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Touch the highest paying method out of all the Binary Option styles. Second Trading was built especially for Binary Option Trading. In the opposite case an investor would purchase a Put Option if they believe that the trade would move down at the time the expiration lapses. Trading availability depends on the underlying assets, and whether the markets permit them to be traded at the time, depending on which Option Type you are using to trade Binary Options. Once the expiry time has been selected, the final step of the process is for the investor to input how much they want to invest on that particular option. To read more about each trading strategies follow the links. This method is designed for experienced trades who want more control of their trades.

Touch requires an investor to forecast the not only the direction of the asset, but the option must land on a set price at moment that the expiry time lapses. It has become one of the more popular ways to trade Binary Options as the method is fast and not difficult to execute. An investor would purchase a Call Option if they believed that the asset will move up by the time that the option expires. Touch the only form of trading that is available over the weekends when markets are closed. Binary Option trading strategies. For further information about what assets are available to trade on our Binary Option Platform refer to our Asset Index.

Put Trade but the trader only needs to fill out information on the asset, direction and amount. This is also a good way to see how good and bad Android apps are constructed and how to learn from them. Decompiling Android looks at the the reason why Android apps can be decompiled to recover their source code, what it means to Android developers and how you can protect your code from prying eyes.